I've seen the future and it talks bollocks

Tony Judt's illness is gradually destroying his motor functions until only his brain remains.  The brain works admirably but soon it will be like the philosopher's tree which no-one hears when it falls in the forest.  Interview with him here:-

The shortage of public intellectuals (in the English-speaking world) goes back to the decline of the written media: the first TV intellectual was Foucault, who was at home in both media, but his successors and imitators know only the camera. This forces sound bites upon even the most complex material: see Schama, Ferguson e tutti quanti. Also, and paradoxically: public intellectuals are best when they are grounded in a particular language, culture, debate. Thus Camus was French, Habermas is German, Sen is Bengali, Orwell was deep English. This made their cross-frontier ventures plausible, in the same way that Havel or Michnik today have street cred because they started out as courageous dissidents in a very particular time and place. The opposite is the ridiculous Slavoj Zizek: a “global”’ public intellectual who is therefore of no particular interest in any one place or on any one subject. If he is the future of public intellectuals, then they have no future.

Comments

[Andrew Coates]

There's also Judt's moving article in the NYRB about how his illness his affecting his relationship with words.

I have respect for the man, hey!

http://tendancecoatesy.wordpress.com/2010/07/26/ill-fares-the-land-review-living-social-democracy/

[Andrew Coates]

I'm sad to say, Tony Judt is dead:

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ukpress/article/ALeqM5h42XEEf-ew2kVvjkbjRYRHsjIeeg